Taihe: A Lawyer’s Story | The Human World Within the Case Files — Ten Years in the Life of a Litigation Attorney
Release Date:
2026-09-26
Editor’s Note:
In Taihe, every lawyer has their own story.
Some have moved from the bench to the defense table; others, having completed their studies abroad, have chosen Taihe; and still others have forged their journey here, transforming from interns into partners. Though their backgrounds and areas of expertise vary, they all share a common ethos: professionalism, resilience, and warmth.
This is precisely the intention behind launching our “Taihe: Lawyers’ Stories” column. We hope to show you the most authentic side of the Taihe lawyers—beyond the courtroom. And through their stories, we aim to help more people understand that at Taihe, law is not merely a profession; it is a passion worthy of your trust.
Q: At the outset of your practice, why did you choose to specialize in either litigation or non‑litigation? What convinced you to commit to this path? In your view, what is the most significant difference between litigation and non‑litigation work? And if you have experience working across both domains, how do litigation lawyers perceive non‑litigation lawyers, and vice versa?
A: To be honest, in my first year in the industry, I hadn’t thought things through that clearly. Since the team specializes in litigation, it was only natural that I began handling litigation matters. Litigation cases typically have lengthy timelines, From the case filing window to the courtroom, with each summons and every court session, that… " Unravel a tangled mess into a single thread. " The process has become addictive to me. Also receive My first independent speech was at a… Lease In court during a contract dispute, Fortunately, having prepared a timeline and a chronology of key events in advance, along with thorough pre-trial preparations, I felt less anxious when the judge questioned me about the facts during the trial.
In my view, the biggest difference between litigation and non-litigation is… The Direction of Time . Litigation is " Looking back "—— The damage has already been done, and the losses have already occurred; your task is to reconstruct the evidence and restore the proper order within the established facts. Non-litigation, by contrast, is more like… " Look ahead "—— Even before a transaction takes place, you’re already designing the rules and mitigating risks. Over the years of serving as in-house counsel, I’ve come to increasingly appreciate that… " Prevention is cheaper than firefighting. " A clearly drafted liquidated damages clause can indeed save you from two subsequent lawsuits.
If you were to ask me how I see each other —— In the eyes of a litigation lawyer, an M&A and corporate‑law attorney is meticulous, steady, and possesses superb drafting skills—able to revise a single contract up to the tenth draft without losing patience. Meanwhile, in the eyes of an M&A and corporate‑law attorney, a litigation lawyer is quick on their feet, resilient under pressure, and unafraid to speak up in court. " No " , but sometimes I take things too seriously. In fact, the two are two sides of the same coin; every clause I draft in routine legal services is based on imagination. " If it ends up in court, how will the judge view it? “Moreover, during the early stages of litigation when clients seek advice, we also offer certain recommendations and strategies from the perspective of maximizing the case’s favorable outcomes.”
Q: What is your primary area of expertise? Could you share a case or project that left a lasting impression on you?
A: Main focuses: Contract disputes, corporate legal counsel, family and matrimonial matters To outsiders, the scope may seem broad, but I personally find it remarkably cohesive—these three matters all revolve around “relationships”: collaborative partnerships, business‑operational dynamics, and family ties. In the end, they all boil down to helping people bring a troubled relationship to a graceful close or re‑establish it on sound footing.
What left the deepest impression was a batch of labor dispute cases I handled early in my practice. Because the employees had engaged in conduct—such as violating workplace discipline—during working hours, the employer terminated their employment contracts. Subsequently, the employees filed lawsuits, seeking compensation for unlawful termination. In this group of cases, we represented the employers.
At the time, as workers gathered in large numbers at the entrances to offices and meeting rooms during working hours, the lawyers’ task was to review surveillance footage, sifting through days and nights of recordings to pinpoint the exact times and frequency with which a particular worker appeared in the video.
In total, there were more than forty workers, none of whom we knew personally. Relying solely on photographs and the assistance of the company’s HR department, we painstakingly reviewed and documented each frame of video footage that was already of poor quality. Ultimately, we successfully compiled detailed records of each worker’s presence—both the timing and frequency—and captured screenshots for evidence, which we then submitted to the court. In the end, the court ruled that those workers who, during working hours, appeared at non‑work locations with excessive frequency and for extended durations had violated workplace discipline, justifying a lawful termination.
I still remember on the day of the trial, when I saw the plaintiff across from me, I could instantly recognize each person by name. Litigation, it turns out, is a remarkably meticulous undertaking. The fact that I was able to patiently devote myself to this work and achieve a satisfactory outcome has given me tremendous confidence for my future career.
A: Three things—each one requires hard, steady effort, but they really work.
Q: Have you ever encountered periods of intense pressure during your practice—such as high‑stakes court hearings, complex transactions, or cross‑border negotiations? How did you manage to regain your composure and keep moving forward?
A: Last year, I handled a transportation contract dispute for one of my advisory clients, with the total value of the case exceeding RMB 100 million. Although the matter was bifurcated into several separate proceedings, each still involved claims in excess of RMB 10 million, making the litigation pressures understandably immense.
Q: How do you typically interact with clients? What key considerations should you keep in mind when communicating with them?
A: My principle: Listen first, then speak; don’t promise outcomes; deliver bad news as soon as possible.
Q: If, during the course of an investigation, you discover that a party has failed to truthfully disclose key facts, how would you typically proceed?
A: Step one, Stop to verify. Don’t rush to draw conclusions—first lay out the objective evidence (bank transfer records, chat logs, and the original contract) to determine whether he simply misremembered or overlooked something, or whether he deliberately concealed it. In many cases, it’s a matter of “selective omission”—he isn’t trying to deceive you; he just feels that certain details would be unfavorable to him, so he leaves them out.
Q: At Taihe, what kind of support or influence has your team or your partners provided you? How is Taihe’s “mentorship and knowledge-sharing” culture reflected in your experience?
A: The team has had the greatest impact on me and has helped me develop strong teamwork skills. First, when working on legal documents, I strive for meticulous attention to detail—leaving no room for even the slightest punctuation error—and ensure that my materials are concise, logically structured, and clearly focused on the key points. Second, when interacting with clients, I make it a habit to reflect on which remarks may have been ill‑timed, which questions truly addressed their needs, and how to read between the lines to grasp their underlying concerns. Finally, I approach case reviews systematically: for cases we win, I don’t just examine how much of our claims the court upheld; I also assess whether the court accepted our line of reasoning and identify the specific evidence that supported our position. For cases we lose, I extract lessons and take them as opportunities to prepare more effectively for an appeal or a retrial. This is the most profound influence the team has had on me. When mentoring junior lawyers, I follow the same approach: I revise their drafts but always explain the rationale behind each change; before trial, I walk them through the proceedings, and afterward, we conduct a joint debrief. To me, “passing on knowledge and guiding others” is not merely about teaching technical skills—it’s about instilling a mindset toward work itself. One must approach each case with a sense of reverence. 。
Q: If you had to describe Taihe in three words, which ones would you choose, and why?
A: Professional, trustworthy, and loyal.
Q: Do you think the legal profession is highly stressful? How do you typically manage work-related stress and physical fatigue?
A: Big—very big. This line of work has one distinctive feature: it doesn’t end when the workday is over. Cases stay with you, lodged in your mind—the court dates, the parties’ phone numbers, and the expected timing of the judgment—all of it follows you home.
Q: In your spare time from a busy work schedule, what hobbies do you enjoy to unwind?
A: Beyond exercise, I enjoy cooking and reading. Cooking and solving cases are somewhat alike: both require careful preparation, precise attention to timing, and an unwillingness to rush. The half-hour I spend chopping vegetables is the most relaxing part of my day. In addition, I’ve subscribed to WeChat Reading and make it a point to read every day—diversifying between professional texts, psychology, game theory, classic novels, and more. Consistently engaging in deep reading provides invaluable mental nourishment. To date, I’ve already logged over 1,000 hours on WeChat Reading, and I plan to keep up this habit of immersive reading going forward.
Q: What is your professional creed? How do you view the social responsibility of the legal profession? And how do you balance social responsibility with economic interests?
A: My creed is: Treat the client’s concerns as your own, but when demonstrating empathy, refrain from internalizing their emotions.
Q: What advice would you most like to offer to young lawyers who have just begun practicing? Alternatively, under what circumstances would you advise them to proceed with caution?
A: Here’s a simple piece of advice: For the first three years, don’t rush to pick your niche.
Q: Could you share a legal book or a legal film that you enjoy?
A: I recommend the book “Letters to Young Lawyers” by Professor Chen Shaowen. Through 50 exchanged letters, it tackles real‑world issues: how to study, how to choose a career path, what to do when you’re exhausted, and whether or not to trust the legal profession. Professor Chen avoids empty platitudes, focusing instead on logic and practical experience. The line that resonated with me most is this: “Happiness takes precedence over responsibility.” It’s ideal for law students, as well as for seasoned practitioners who may be feeling burnt out.
Q: In terms of your professional or career development, are there any initiatives you’ve long wanted to pursue but haven’t yet started?
A: I’ve always wanted to do it. Self-media Actually, I’ve had this idea for a long time: to use short videos or图文 content to explain the common pitfalls in contract disputes—such as the most frequent breach‑of‑contract traps small and medium‑sized enterprises fall into when dealing with sales contracts, or how individuals can properly gather and preserve evidence when taking out personal loans. These topics are genuinely helpful for everyday people and small business owners, but I’ve kept putting it off, always telling myself, “I’ll get around to it later.” This year, I’m determined to push myself: I’ll start by posting once a week on Xiaohongshu and Video Accounts, and even if only a few dozen people watch at first, that’ll still be a step forward.
Q: Throughout your practice, has there ever been a moment when you felt… “Being a lawyer is really great”? What happened in that moment?
A: Yes. I once handled a matrimonial and family law case in which the client was the child’s father. When he first consulted me, the child was only a few months old. Since birth, the child’s mother has completely neglected her parental responsibilities—she neither visits the child nor contributes to any of the child’s daily expenses.
The case was handled with meticulous attention to detail: we carefully reviewed the WeChat chat logs between both parties, and traced every expense related to the child since birth—ranging from daily care to hospital visits. From the moment the child was born, it was solely the child’s father, along with the grandparents, who provided for and cared for the child. In the end, after more than a year and three rounds of litigation, the case concluded successfully, with custody awarded to the child’s father. Ensuring that the child can grow up in an environment filled with love is of paramount importance for their future development.
Later, the client and I became good friends, and on occasion we’d even take our kids out for a weekend outing together.
Seeing the sincere, innocent smile on the client’s child’s face, and the little hand that clasped mine, I deeply feel that what we handle are not just cases, but people’s lives.
Being a lawyer is truly wonderful.
He Ying, Taihe Law Firm
Follow us
Previous page
Related News