Taihe Updates | The First Plenary Meeting of the Taihe Committee on Criminal and Criminal-Civil Intersection Legal Practice Was Held Successfully

To further clarify the firm’s strategic positioning, build differentiated core competencies, and integrate its in-house criminal law service resources, the first plenary meeting of the Taihe Criminal and Criminal–Civil Intersection Legal Practice Committee was successfully held in Nanjing on August 11. The meeting was chaired by Attorney Sun Guanzhong, Director of the Committee, with Deputy Directors Mou Hualǐ and Committee Members Wang Xiao, Shi Qiao, and Attorney Zhang Wei attending in person, while Attorneys Dai Feiyang and Zhou Zhongmei participated online. Participants engaged in thorough discussions on key issues—including team brand building, strategic professional focus, and practical implementation pathways—reaching a shared understanding and charting a clear course for the Committee’s future high‑quality development.

I. Anchoring on specialized industry tracks and defining a differentiated development path

The meeting began with an in-depth discussion on building specialized practice labels and selecting niche areas of focus. Participants unanimously agreed that the criminal law services market is increasingly trending toward specialization, and that Taihe should avoid a one-size-fits-all approach that risks homogenization. Instead, leveraging its deep-rooted expertise in civil and commercial matters across securities and capital markets, bulk commodity trading, quasi‑financial sectors, and fund investment, Taihe should pursue a differentiated development strategy centered on “industry‑specific scenarios + criminal expertise.” By concentrating resources on cultivating highly recognizable, market‑responsive professional brands, it can drive overall growth in its criminal practice through breakthroughs in key areas. Regarding individual career planning, the meeting proposed a collaborative model of “holistic coordination plus in‑depth specialization,” encouraging members to draw on their own practice experience to identify and anchor themselves in specific sub‑sectors. Within these niche markets, by pooling complementary strengths and fostering division of labor, they can build a broad, highly specialized business capability matrix.

II. Refine implementation measures and develop a comprehensive, multi‑dimensional development plan.

With regard to the team’s future business development and brand implementation, the meeting outlined several pragmatic action plans. In terms of professional content development, the team has adopted a research framework that integrates “industry structure” with “criminal risk,” instituted a collaborative working model, and leveraged the firm’s established expertise in specific practice areas. This approach ensures that criminal lawyers gain a deep understanding of industry nuances and conduct in-depth analyses of sector‑specific challenges, with the aim of producing a series of specialized outputs and compiling them into a comprehensive volume within the year. On the events and training front, the plan is to establish a hybrid internal–external training system: internally, thematic sessions on criminal risk will be delivered to front‑office teams handling civil and commercial matters, fostering cross‑practice collaboration; externally, industry experts will be invited to lead practical seminars and workshops. In the realm of brand communication, the strategy involves developing a multi‑platform short‑video content matrix, creating a series of targeted, practice‑oriented video pieces around specific offenses and client needs to generate sustained outreach and impact. At the same time, the team will actively participate in industry‑wide professional awards and the firm’s legal‑service‑product competition, using tangible results as feedback to refine its expertise, enhance industry recognition, and increase market visibility.

III. Improving the operational mechanism to ensure the orderly advancement of work

The meeting also reached consensus on the Criminal Committee’s operating mechanisms and foundational support measures, agreeing to convene working sessions as needed in accordance with the principles of efficiency and pragmatism, regularly summarize achievements, and chart future directions. In addition, it will allocate dedicated funding to underpin small-scale seminars and workshops, ensuring the orderly implementation of all tasks. The members of the Criminal Committee unanimously agreed that this meeting marks a new starting point for the professional development of the Taihe Criminal Committee, and that all members must embrace a spirit of collaboration, work together to deepen expertise and strengthen the Committee’s reputation, and swiftly deliver landmark outcomes.

The convening of this conference marks the official transition of the Criminal and Criminal–Civil Intersection Practice Committee of Taihe Law Firm into a fully operational, substantive phase. Moving forward, the Committee will continue to deepen its expertise in specialized areas, strengthen collaborative innovation, and refine high‑quality criminal legal service offerings. It will strive to build a distinctive criminal practice brand that reflects Taihe’s unique strengths, providing comprehensive, professional criminal legal support to all types of market entities and contributing to the high‑quality development of the Firm’s criminal practice.

Follow us